What Changed from 2003 to 2014, and What’s Coming Next

The Construction Regulations don’t get rewritten often. When they do, it signals that the Department of Employment and Labour has decided the current framework is no longer fit for purpose. That happened once, in 2014. It’s about to happen again.

The Draft Construction Regulations, 2024 — published for public comment under GN 5983 in Government Gazette No. 52267 on 12 March 2025 — will, once finalised, repeal and replace the Construction Regulations, 2014. Public comment closed on 10 June 2025, and at the time of writing the draft has not yet been finalised or promulgated. That matters for planning purposes: nothing below is enforceable yet. But the direction of travel is clear, and clients, principal contractors, and HSE practitioners who wait for the final Government Gazette before adjusting their systems will be reacting under time pressure instead of preparing on their own terms.

This post traces the arc from the original 2003 Regulations, through the 2014 overhaul, to what the 2025 draft proposes — and sets out what each of you should be doing about it now.

Want the high-level version first? SAIOSH’s webinar walkthrough of the draft changes is a useful primer. For a detailed, site-specific breakdown of what these changes mean for your projects and appointment structures, AOAL Consulting Services can be consulted directly.

1. The 2003 Regulations: The First Construction-Specific Framework

Before 2003, construction health and safety in South Africa sat within the general provisions of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 85 of 1993 (OHSA), without a dedicated regulatory instrument for the sector’s particular risk profile. The Construction Regulations, 2003 changed that — introducing, for the first time, construction-specific duties for clients, principal contractors, and contractors, and formally extending liability up the chain to clients and designers rather than leaving it solely with contractors on site.

The problem was implementation. Multi-stakeholder participation — particularly from clients and designers, who were newly captured by the regulations — remained weak, and the construction fatality and injury rate did not move in the direction the regulations intended.

2. The 2014 Regulations: Professionalisation and a Permitting System

The Construction Regulations, 2014 (GN R84, Government Gazette 37305, 7 February 2014) repealed the 2003 Regulations and introduced the framework most of the industry currently operates under. The two changes with the most operational bite were:

The Construction Work Permit (CWP). For projects exceeding 180 days, more than 1 800 person-days of construction work, or a contract value at or above R13 million (CIDB grading level 6), a client must apply to the Provincial Director at least 30 days before work starts. This created a hard planning dependency that hadn’t existed before — project timelines now had a regulatory gate built in.

Professional registration. The 2014 Regulations empowered the South African Council for the Project and Construction Management Professions (SACPCMP) as the statutory body for registering three tiers of construction health and safety professional: the Construction Health and Safety Agent, Manager, and Officer. This shifted construction H&S from a role anyone could occupy to a registered profession with a competence-testing gate.

The 2014 Regulations also introduced a phased transition — a six-month exemption for projects already under way, and an 18-month exemption specifically for the CWP and notification provisions — which is instructive for how the 2025 transition is likely to be structured.

Despite the added stringency, disabling injury and fatality rates in the sector did not fall as intended. That performance gap is the stated rationale behind the 2025 draft.

3. The Draft 2025 Regulations: What’s Actually Changing

Based on the Draft Construction Regulations, 2024 as published in March 2025, here is what shifts relative to the current 2014 framework:

Area	2014 Regulations (current)	Draft 2025 Regulations (proposed)
CWP trigger — duration	Work exceeding 180 days	Work exceeding 365 days
CWP trigger — value/grading	Contract value ≥ R13m or CIDB grading level 6	Contract value exceeding CIDB grading level 7
CWP trigger — new criterion	Not present	Work exceeding 2 storeys above ground level
Notification of construction work	Tied to specific categories of work	No longer tied to specific work categories; contractor must notify 7 days before starting; client must also notify the Provincial Director 7 days before starting for registered CIDB projects
Client’s baseline duty	Baseline risk assessment	Documented design risk assessment — a shift toward design-stage risk ownership
H&S management appointments	Principal contractor discretion, no mandatory officer	Principal contractor may appoint one or more Construction H&S Managers by section; mandatory appointment of a full-time or part-time Construction H&S Officer; construction manager must appoint construction supervisors in writing
Ergonomics duty	Contractor must ensure ergonomic hazards are analysed, evaluated, and addressed “as far as reasonably practicable”	Removed as a standalone contractor duty — though separately, commentary on the draft flags ergonomics as a broader thematic emphasis, so treat this as unsettled rather than a clean deletion
Risk assessment review trigger	On design/construction change affecting risk profile, or after a section 9(1)(d)/(e) incident	Same triggers, plus a new fixed 12-month review cycle regardless of whether a triggering event occurs
Core definitions	“Agent”, “client”, “contractor” as per 2014 wording	Redefined to reflect current project delivery models and a broader view of responsibility across the project lifecycle

Two things stand out for practitioners:

First, the CWP thresholds are being raised, not tightened — a project that required a permit under 2014 (say, a 200-day, R14m job) may fall outside the permit requirement under the draft unless it also exceeds 2 storeys. That’s a real compliance-scope change, not a drafting nuance, and it cuts against the general narrative that the 2025 draft is uniformly “stricter.”

Second, the mandatory H&S Officer appointment is a genuine tightening. Under 2014, the appointment structure left room for judgement; the draft removes that discretion for the officer role specifically, while keeping it for the Manager role. If your current appointment structure on any live project relies on informal or part-time coverage without a documented appointment letter, that gap becomes a compliance exposure the moment this is promulgated.

Separately, industry commentary on the draft (including from bodies engaging in the public comment process) frames it as introducing distinct, statutorily registrable roles for Construction Health and Safety Officers and Managers, with mandatory registration through SACPCMP-approved bodies — extending the professionalisation trend started in 2014 rather than reversing it.

For a session-length, high-level run-through of these changes, SAIOSH’s webinar on the draft Construction Regulations is a solid overview. If you need the detail applied to a specific project or portfolio, that’s where AOAL Consulting Services comes in.

4. What This Means in Practice

For clients: The shift from a baseline risk assessment to a documented design risk assessment moves risk ownership earlier into the project lifecycle — into the design phase, before a principal contractor is even appointed. If your organisation procures construction work, your design brief and tender documentation process needs to be able to produce this documentation, not retrofit it once a contractor is on site.

For principal contractors: Audit your current H&S appointment structure now against the mandatory officer requirement. Don’t wait for promulgation — a documented, defensible appointment structure is good practice regardless of which version of the regulations is in force, and getting there before the deadline avoids a scramble.

For HSE practitioners and consultants: The redefinition of “agent”, “client”, and “contractor” will ripple into every appointment letter, contract clause, and safety file template that references those terms. This is not a one-line update — it’s a document audit across your entire client base.

For everyone: Nothing in the draft is final. Public comment closed in June 2025, and government notices have flagged intent to proceed, but the regulations remain in draft form. Build your systems to be compatible with the draft direction without treating any specific clause as locked in. The gap between draft and final text — as the 2014 process showed, with phased exemptions built into the transition — is where sensible risk management happens.

The Bottom Line

The pattern across 2003, 2014, and the 2025 draft is consistent: each revision responds to the previous framework’s failure to move the injury and fatality needle, and each response is more procedural and appointment-heavy than the last. The 2025 draft continues that trajectory on appointments and design-stage risk ownership, while — somewhat counterintuitively — loosening the permit thresholds that trigger the most administratively burdensome part of the current regime.

If you’re relying on 2014-era systems today, the gap between where you are and where the draft is heading isn’t hypothetical. It’s a documentation and appointment-structure gap you can start closing now, before it becomes a compliance finding. AOAL Consulting Services can walk you through a site-specific gap assessment against the draft.

This is the third post in AOAL Consulting Services’ regulatory series on South African HSE legislation. A previous post covered the Physical Agents Regulations, 2024 — see also our follow-up on becoming a Competent Person under the new Physical Agents Regulations. Our Noise Exposure Regulations, 2024 post follows in the coming weeks.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Stay updated with the latest news and offers.

First Name

Last Name

Email address:

I have read and agree to the Terms & Conditions and the Privacy Policy.

Leave this field empty if you're human:

Watch: SAIOSH webinar — a high-level walkthrough of the draft Construction Regulations changes. For a detailed, project-specific view of how these changes affect you, consult AOAL directly.

Watch: SAIOSH’s webinar covers the draft Construction Regulations changes at a high level. For a detailed, site-specific breakdown, AOAL Consulting Services can be consulted directly.

References

Department of Employment and Labour (2025) Draft Construction Regulations, 2024, Government Notice 5983, Government Gazette No. 52267, 12 March 2025. Pretoria: Government Printer.

Department of Labour (2014) Construction Regulations, 2014, Government Notice R84, Government Gazette No. 37305, 7 February 2014. Pretoria: Government Printer.

ENSafrica (2025) South Africa: Occupational Health and Safety Act, 85 of 1993 (“OHASA”) – Public Comments on the Draft Construction Regulations 2024. Available at: https://www.ensafrica.com/news/detail/9938/south-africa-occupational-health-and-safety-a (Accessed: 17 August 2026).

South African Government News Agency (2025) Public comments sought on repeal of Construction Regulations. Available at: https://www.sanews.gov.za/south-africa/public-comments-sought-repeal-construction-regulations (Accessed: 17 August 2026).

Tiefenthaler Legal (2025) Draft Construction Regulations 2025: What Clients, Contractors and Developers Need to Know. Available at: https://tiefenthalerlegal.com/2025/06/24/draft-construction-regulations-2025-what-clients-contractors-and-developers-need-to-know/ (Accessed: 17 August 2026).

Occupational Health and Safety Act 85 of 1993. Pretoria: Government Printer.

South African Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (SAIOSH) (2025) Webinar: Draft Construction Regulations — Key Changes Overview. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2ZcY38kQZg (Accessed: 17 August 2026).